Warning: file_exists(): File name is longer than the maximum allowed path length on this platform (260): C:\zpanel\hostdata\zadmin\public_html\forexbr_com_br/wp-content/cache/supercache/www.forexbr.com.br/2020/03/09/deep-dive-these-energy-companies-have-the-highest-debt-and-the-most-at-risk-as-the-oil-market-collapses/meta-wp-cache-b8095df82dbeb882557a057d56bf1a29.php in C:\zpanel\hostdata\zadmin\public_html\forexbr_com_br\wp-content\plugins\wp-super-cache\wp-cache-phase2.php on line 71 Deep Dive: These energy companies have the highest debt and the most at risk as the oil market collapses – Forex Brasil

Deep Dive: These energy companies have the highest debt and the most at risk as the oil market collapses

“Now the question is, what is the Russian response?” said Philip Orlando, chief equity market strategist for Federated Hermes, in an interview. “Do they hold their breath until they turn blue? Or do they say, ‘You have the market weight here, why don’t we sit down to cut and stabilize the market?’ That may be too obvious and rational, so I have no idea how this is going to end up.”

Read:Why an oil price war is wreaking havoc on stocks and global financial markets right now

Highly leveraged energy companies

Banks with heavy exposure to the energy industry may be facing defaults, loan losses and other fallout. Here’s a list of banks with the most exposure as a share of tangible common equity.

But how about the energy borrowers? Starting with the S&P Composite 1500 (made up of the S&P 500 SPX, -7.59%, the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index MID, -9.13% and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index SML, -9.64% ), here are the 20 U.S.-listed oil companies with the highest percentages of long-term debt to equity, according to FactSet, based on their most recent regulatory filings as of March 6:

Company Ticker Long-term debt/ equity Industry
Equitrans Midstream Corp. ETRN, -10.47% 90.2% Oil & Gas Pipelines
Tetra Technologies Inc. TTI, -45.97% 84.6% Oilfield Services/Equipment
Apache Corp. APA, -53.86% 71.8% Integrated Oil
Core Laboratories NV CLB, -43.28% 66.1% Oilfield Services/Equipment
Oneok Inc. OKE, -37.75% 66.0% Oil & Gas Pipelines
U.S. Silica Holdings Inc. SLCA, -52.74% 63.1% Other Metals/Minerals
Archrock Inc. AROC, -26.20% 63.1% Oilfield Services/Equipment
Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR, -46.57% 62.8% Contract Drilling
Denbury Resources Inc. DNR, -39.31% 60.5% Oil & Gas Production
Gulfport Energy Corp. GPOR, +1.29% 59.7% Oil & Gas Production
Consol Energy Inc CEIX, -10.14% 58.7% Coal
Laredo Petroleum Inc. LPI, -40.07% 58.1% Oil & Gas Production
Halliburton Co. HAL, -37.64% 57.7% Oilfield Services/Equipment
Range Resources Corp. RRC, -10.30% 57.5% Oil & Gas Production
Williams Companies Inc. WMB, -14.09% 56.7% Oil & Gas Pipelines
Exterran Corp. EXTN, -23.86% 53.3% Oilfield Services/Equipment
Occidental Petroleum Corp. OXY, -52.01% 53.1% Oil & Gas Production
Penn Virginia Corp. PVAC, -48.94% 51.7% Oil & Gas Production
Noble Corp. plc NE, -34.92% 50.5% Contract Drilling
Source: FactSet

You can click on the tickers for more about each company.

Turmoil, the economy and a silver lining

The S&P 500 hit its most recent record high Feb. 19, showing how long it took for the risk to the global economy from the spread of the coronavirus to affect the U.S. stock market. It has been too early for economic reports to show any effect from supply-chain disruptions or reduced revenue for travel-related industries to hit home.

Last week’s employment report showed the U.S. economy added 273,000 jobs during February, with the unemployment rate falling back to a 50-year low of 3.5%.

Luca Paolini, chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management in London, believes investors may stage a strong “relief rally” soon, because stock-market action “has been so brutal.”

But he also said during an interview that “it is quite unusual for a bear market to anticipate a recession even before we see negative indicators” in the U.S. A brief relief rally aside, he doesn’t expect U.S. stocks to bottom until there is a weakening of economic growth.

“Then all the bad news will be out,” he said.

As for the game of chicken between Saudi Arabia and Russia, and the effect on U.S. energy producers, Dimitry Dayen, senior research analyst for energy at ClearBridge Investments, said in an interview that “the vast majority” of U.S. shale oil producers “are not cash flow positive,” and that “you will see bankruptcies” for some of the most highly leveraged players.

Then again, “you also have some large companies with very low leverage that will come out intact,” he added.

In contrast to the companies listed above, Exxon Mobil’s XOM, -12.22% long-term debt was 12.7% as of Dec. 31, and the ratio for Chevron CVX, -15.36% was 15%.

When asked about average costs for oil producers, Dayen said it’s more important to look at the minimal price for producers to be cash-flow positive, and for Saudi Arabia and Russia to consider the prices at which their governments (which rely heavily on oil revenue) can balance their budgets.

Shale-production costs in the U.S. market vary, but according to Dayen, “the best players in the Permian Basin [in the Southwest] need crude north of $50 a barrel in order to be cash flow positive,” while Russia needs a price of about $42 to balance its budget and Saudi Arabia needs a whopping $75 a barrel.

In a world starved for yield, Russia and Saudi Arabia can borrow heavily to finance their governments. All of this is part of the mix as we wait and see if they blink and return to the negotiating table.

Meanwhile, Dayen expects it will take until the second half of 2020 for the current expansion of U.S. production to reverse, leading to lower production late this year or early 2021, as the world oil market eventually stabilizes.

He sees a hidden benefit for natural gas suppliers: Gas is produced as a byproduct of oil, so a production cut for oil can reduce the oversupply and lead to higher natural gas prices.

Don’t miss:You should avoid shares of these banks with too much oil and gas exposure

Original Source:

Comentários